Doctor who provided abortion to 10-year-old girl moves to sue attorney general for defamation

INDIANAPOLIS (WXIN) — An legal professional symbolizing Dr. Caitlin Bernard, who offered an abortion on a 10-yr-previous rape target, has filed a tort assert in opposition to Indiana Attorney Common Todd Rokita — the to start with step in a defamation lawsuit from Rokita.

“Mr. Rokita’s untrue and deceptive statements about alleged misconduct by Dr. Bernard in her profession represent defamation,” claimed Lawyer Kathleen A. DeLaney, who signifies Bernard.

The lawsuit will come on the heels of a stop and desist issued by DeLaney, which was by itself a response to Rokita’s continued community opinions aimed at Bernard. Rokita went on Fox News on July 13, contacting Bernard an “abortion activist performing as a doctor” and mentioned she experienced a “history of failing to report” and even threatened to go immediately after Bernard’s license.

The Fox News caption underneath Rokita proclaimed “Doc Unsuccessful to Report Abortion Abuse Victim,” according to the tort claim.

Nevertheless, Nexstar’s WXIN acquired files showing that Bernard did file the report, and even filed it inside the timeframe required.

DeLaney also explained that a “simple check” on a governing administration license internet site would have verified that Dr. Bernard’s license was energetic with no disciplinary background.

In addition, Indiana College Health and fitness issued a assertion saying they done an investigation into Dr. Bernard and uncovered her in compliance with privacy regulations.

But despite Rokita and his office becoming in a position to get hold of this information and facts, Rokita spoke publically in nationwide and regional media, continuing to vow an investigation into her license, and to see if she experienced filed the report.

“Rokita possibly understood the statements were false or acted with reckless disregard to the reality or falsity of the statements,” DeLaney said in the tort assert. “Mr. Rokita recklessly and/or negligently unsuccessful to confirm no matter whether the statements about Dr. Bernard’s licensure ended up legitimate or fake before producing them.”

DeLaney claimed Rokita’s statements “exceed the general scope of Mr. Rokita’s authority as Indiana’s Attorney Normal.”

“Given the present-day political environment in the United States, Mr. Rokita’s responses have been supposed to heighten public condemnation of Dr. Bernard, who legally offered legit medical care,” the tort claim claimed.

The filing triggers a 90-day investigative time period for the condition to settle the assert, after which a lawsuit can be submitted.

Rokita’s business office furnished WXIN with the following assertion:

Attorney Common Rokita and the Place of work of Lawyer Basic are leaders in the professional-existence movement. His historic get the job done has even more distinguished Indiana as a protector of unborn lifestyle and gals. This is component of a divisive narrative and an attempt to distract from the essential get the job done of the business, which includes the responsibility to identify whetherpractitioners have violated the expectations of follow in his or her profession, as effectively as federal and state legislation. We will protect in opposition to baseless claims.


The Indiana Democratic Party also released a assertion in response to the news:

“Hoosier taxpayers will now have to pay for Lawyer Standard Todd Rokita’s countrywide smear campaign against a health practitioner who helped a 10-12 months-previous rape survivor achieve a authorized and safe and sound abortion. The Indiana GOP reveals much more and far more that they will do something to pursue their extremist agenda — an agenda that eradicates decision and forces girls to have delivery even in instances of rape, incest, or conserving the lifestyle of the mom. This agenda is too intense for Indiana and Hoosiers have had sufficient of Rokita’s self-serving antics.”